In re Haley M.
Filed 8/30/07 In re Haley M. CA1/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
In re HALEY M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
SOLANO COUNTYHEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Respondent, v. CAROL M., Appellant. | A115260 (SolanoCounty Super. Ct. No. J35137) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 1, 2007, be modified as follows:
1. On page 16, at the end of the last paragraph, after the word claims, insert a new footnote as follows and renumber the subsequent footnotes:
In deciding this appeal, we have considered each and every issue briefed by appellant. Not one of appellants arguments has any merit. In this opinion, we explain the lack of merit only as to the issues or arguments that were most germane to the proceeding or the disposition of the appeal.
2. On page 18, at the end of the last paragraph, after the word affirmed, insert a new footnote as follows:
Rule 8.416(e) of the California Rules of Court provides: To permit determination of the appeal within 250 days after the notice of appeal is filed, the appellant must serve and file the appellants opening brief within 30 days after the record is filed in the reviewing court. Appellant failed to file her opening brief within the 30-day deadline. Furthermore, appellant has not demonstrated that the filing of this opinion more than 250 days after the filing of the notice of appeal has deprived this court of jurisdiction, has rendered this opinion void, was prejudicial to appellant or to Haley, or otherwise affects the disposition of this appeal.
This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Dated:_____________________ _________________________
JONES, P.J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.
Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line attorney.
