Gora v. Hanson
Filed 4/6/06 Gora v. Hanson CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| DAVID GORA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ROBERT HANSON et al., Defendants and Appellants. | G035134 (Super. Ct. No. 03CC07179) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gregory Munoz, Judge. Affirmed.
Michael V. Hesse for Defendants and Appellants.
Bryant & Bryant, Kenneth A. Bryant and Michael P. Bryant for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
When Robert and Janice Hanson (the Hansons) sold their house to Dave and Kelli Gora (the Goras), they represented the property was connected to the public sewer system. When the Goras later discovered the property was instead on a septic system, they sued the Hansons for misrepresentation and breach of contract. In binding arbitration, the arbitrator found in favor of the Goras and awarded damages equal to the cost of a sewer connection--$17,500. The Hansons appeal from the trial court's judgment confirming the arbitration award. Because we find there is no issue subject to judicial review, we affirm the judgment.
FACTS
In 1999, the Goras purchased the Hansons' house. The â€
