P. v. Cobb
Filed 9/18/07 P. v. Cobb CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSHUA TY COBB, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B198223 (Super. Ct. No. F345400) (San Luis Obispo County) |
Joshua Ty Cobb appeals from an order revoking probation and sentencing him to two years state prison. In 2003 appellant pleaded guilty to unlawful intercourse with a minor (Pen. Code, 261.5, subd. (d)).[1] The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted five years probation.
Appellant admitted violating probation in 2005. The trial court reinstated probation and ordered appellant to serve 30 days county jail.
In 2006, appellant admitted violating probation a second time. The trial court revoked probation and sentenced appellant to the low term of two years state prison. Appellant was awarded 314 days presentence custody credits and ordered to pay a $300 restitution fine ( 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $300 parole revocation fine ( 1202.45), a $200 statutory fine, a $200 sex offender fine ( 290.3), a $92.50 booking fee (Gov. Code, 29550.2) and a $20 court security fee ( 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)).
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsels examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On July 23, 2007, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have received no response from appellant.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, Acting P.J.
We concur:
COFFEE, J.
PERREN, J.
Dodie A. Harman, Judge
Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo
______________________________
California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.
[1]Unless otherwise stated, all statutory references are to the Penal Code.
