legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Valley Outdoor, Inc. v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Valley Outdoor, Inc. v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
09:30:2007

Valley Outdoor, Inc. v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc.




Filed 9/15/06 Valley Outdoor, Inc. v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. CA2/8








NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION EIGHT










VALLEY OUTDOOR, INC. et al.,


Cross-Complainants and Appellants,


v.


REGENCY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. et al.,


Cross-Defendants and Respondents.



B182312 and B183066


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BC 305029)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION


and


DENYING PETITON FOR REHEARING


[no change in judgment]



THE COURT:*


IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed in the above-captioned matter on September 5, 2006, be modified as follows:


On page 16, the following four sentences are deleted:


â€





Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale