P. v. Ramirez
Filed 4/10/06 P. v. Ramirez CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANGELICA RAMIREZ, Defendant and Appellant. | D047174 (Super. Ct. No. SCS186181) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jeffrey F. Fraser, Judge. Affirmed.
Angelica Ramirez entered a negotiated guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter. (Pen. Code, § 192.) She waived the right to appeal from denial of a motion to suppress evidence, issues relating to prior strikes, and any stipulated sentence. The court sentenced her to a stipulated 11 years in prison. The record does not include a certificate of probable cause. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 30(b).)
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether the preliminary hearing transcript provides an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea; (2) whether the guilty plea was knowing and intelligent; (3) whether the trial court abused its discretion by imposing the sentence; and (4) whether the waiver of the right to appeal was valid.
We granted Ramirez permission to file a brief on her own behalf. She has not responded. A review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issues referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Ramirez on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
McDONALD, Acting P. J.
WE CONCUR:
O'ROURKE, J.
AARON, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Apartment Manager Attorneys.
