Riggs v. Archacki
Filed 3/17/06 Riggs v. Archacki CA1/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| SUZANNE RIGGS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK ARCHACKI, Defendant and Appellant. |
A109982
(Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG 03107406)
|
Appellant Mark Archacki appeals in propria persona from a judgment after a court trial, in which the trial court ruled in favor of respondent Suzanne Riggs, awarding her damages of $34,198. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
We experience great difficulty in stating the relevant facts, because they are not stated in coherent fashion in appellant's opening brief, and appellant has not provided an adequate record of the proceedings in this matter. Nevertheless, we will summarize the most relevant facts as best we can for purposes of background.
Appellant and respondent began a dating relationship in the summer of 2001. Appellant told respondent that he was making â€
