legal news


Register | Forgot Password

SAIF CORPORATION v.SAMPSON

SAIF CORPORATION v.SAMPSON
04:11:2006



SAIF CORPORATION v.SAMPSON







FILED: April 5, 2006



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON




In the Matter of the Compensation of John E. Sampson, Claimant.


SAIF CORPORATION and GLASPRO, INC.,


Petitioners,


v.


JOHN E. SAMPSON; LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE CORPORATION/ACTION AUTO GLASS; EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU/SAFELITE GLASS CORPORATION; and SAIF CORPORATION/ACTION AUTO GLASS,


Respondents.


03-00842, 01-09554, 01-01130, 01-07009; A126483




Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.


Argued and submitted February 28, 2006.


James W. Moller argued the cause and filed the opening brief for petitioners. With him on the reply brief was Scheminske & Lyons, LLP.


David O. Wilson argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation and Action Auto Glass.


David L. Runner argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents SAIF Corporation and Action Auto Glass.


Ronald A. Fontana and Fontana & Takaro, P.C., filed the brief for respondent John E. Sampson.


Mark P. Bronstein and Law Offices of Mark P. Bronstein filed the brief for respondents Employers Insurance of Wausau and Safelite Glass Corporation.


Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Rosenblum, Judges.


PER CURIAM


Affirmed. SAIF v. Yokum, 132 Or App 18, 887 P2d 380 (1994).


Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.


Analysis and review provided by Vista Apartment Manager Lawyers.





Description A decision regarding Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale