P. v. Rosetti
Filed 4/20/06 P. v. Rosetti CA1/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ACHILLE ANTHONY ROSETTI, Defendant and Appellant. | A112563 (Mendocino County Super. Ct. Nos. SCUK-CRCR-01-46293, SCWL-CRCR-02-48224, SCUK-CRCR-04-63161) |
Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence following pleas of guilty to various charges alleged in three separate cases. His appellate counsel has filed an opening brief that raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review as required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259.) We have reviewed the record on appeal and find no meritorious issues to be argued.
In a complaint[1] filed on November 6, 2001, it was alleged that defendant violated Health and Safety Code section 11350, subdivision (a), Health and Safety Code section 11550, subdivision (a), and Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (a). The latter two charges were misdemeanors. On December 10, 2001, defendant entered a plea of guilty to a violation of Healthy and Safety Code section 11350, subdivision (a) and the remaining two misdemeanor charges were dismissed. Entry of judgment was deferred for â€
