legal news


Register | Forgot Password

LODGE v.CAROLE McNEIL

LODGE v.CAROLE McNEIL
05:20:2006

LODGE v.CAROLE McNEIL




Filed 5/10/06





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.





COPY


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA




THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT




(Placer)


----








CAL-NEVA LODGE, INC.,


Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Respondent,


v.


CAROLE McNEIL et al.,


Defendants, Cross- Complainants and Appellants; RAY BLUTH, Cross-Defendant and Respondent.



C048678



(Super. Ct. No. SCV13000)





Plaintiff Cal-Neva Lodge, Inc. (Cal-Neva) and defendants Robert and Carole McNeil (the McNeils) share a property boundary near a scenic part of the northern Lake Tahoe shoreline. This case shows that while a thing of beauty may be a joy forever, it may also provide a headache of a lawsuit.


From 1986 to 2001, Cal-Neva used a path to an elevated rock formation, adjacent to its western property line, for photographing its wedding clients on the formation. The formation--known as â€





Description A decision as to prescriptive easement along the path and at the Point for wedding photos.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale