legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Zimmerman

P. v. Zimmerman
05:24:2006


P. v. Zimmerman





Filed 5/9/06 P. v. Zimmerman CA2/3






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.






IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA






SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT






DIVISION THREE














THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


FRANKLIN ZIMMERMAN,


Defendant and Appellant.



B183605


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. NA062846)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,


Joan Comparet-Cassani, Judge. Dismissed.


A. William Bartz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


_________________________


Franklin Zimmerman appeals the judgment entered after his conviction based on a plea of guilty to possession of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court sentenced Zimmerman to a term of fours years in state prison.


We appointed counsel to represent Zimmerman on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief which raised no issues and requested this court to conduct an independent review of the record. By notice filed March 2, 2006, the clerk of this court advised Zimmerman to submit any contention, ground of appeal or argument he wished this court to consider within 30 days. No response has been received to date.


We have examined the entire record and are satisfied Zimmerman's counsel has complied fully with counsel's responsibilities. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284 [145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443.) Because Zimmerman pleaded guilty and failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause, the appeal must be dismissed as inoperative. (In re Chavez (2003) 30 Cal.4th 643, 649-651; People v. Mendez (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1084, 1096-1097; Pen. Code, § 1237.5.)


DISPOSITION


The appeal is dismissed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


KLEIN, P. J.


We concur:


CROSKEY, J. ALDRICH, J.


Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.


Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Apartment Manager Attorneys.





Description A decision regarding possession of a controlled substance.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale