In re Caleb B.
Filed 5/8/06 In re Caleb B. CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
| In re CALEB B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B183088 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TJ14644) |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALEB B., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Charles Clay III, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
Tonja R. Torres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels and Allison H. Chung, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
________________________
Caleb B. (the minor) appeals from an order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court for committing the offenses of unlawfully driving and taking a vehicle and second degree robbery. He challenges the constitutionality of one of his probation conditions. We affirm the order as modified.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Los Angeles district attorney filed a petition alleging the minor unlawfully drove and took a vehicle (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602; Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), a misdemeanor, which the minor subsequently admitted. The following day, the district attorney filed a second petition alleging the minor had committed second degree robbery, a felony. (Pen. Code, § 211.) Following an adjudication hearing, the juvenile court found the minor had committed second degree robbery by forcibly taking the victim's wallet from her handbag after a struggle. The juvenile court sustained the allegations in both petitions, declared the minor a continuing ward of the court, and ordered him into camp community placement, subject to certain terms and conditions of probation. The court calculated the maximum theoretical period of confinement as five years four months.
DISCUSSION
Among the probation conditions imposed was condition 16. The juvenile court told the minor not to have any â€
