In re Martin S.
Filed 5/17/06 In re Martin S. CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
In re MARTIN S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B183375 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PJ35796) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARTIN S., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angles County,
Morton Rochman, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
Derek K. Kowata, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson and Herbert S. Tetef, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
__________________________
Martin S. was declared a ward of the juvenile court and placed home on probation after the court sustained a two-count petition alleging he had sold marijuana. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602.) He contends one of his probation conditions is unconstitutional. We affirm the order as modified.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Among the conditions of his probation, Martin S. was ordered to perform 40 hours of community service; to participate in a counseling program; to refrain from drinking alcoholic beverages; and, in condition 21, to â€
