P. v. Harker
Filed 6/8/06 P. v. Harker CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT HARKER, Defendant and Appellant. | B184190 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA049633) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Robert J. Schuit, Judge. Affirmed.
Richard J. Moller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Michael C. Keller and Alene M. Games, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
______________
Robert Harker (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following his negotiated pleas of no contest to identity theft and possessing methamphetamine. (Pen. Code, § 530.5, subd. (a), Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).)[1] Before he entered his pleas, the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence. (§ 1538.5.) At sentencing, the trial court committed him to state prison for two years.
On appeal, he contends that the â€
