TBF Financial v. Bada
Filed 6/2/06 TBF Financial v. Bada CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| TBF FINANCIAL, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANILO BADA, Defendant and Appellant. | E037678 (Super.Ct.No. RIC396199) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Thomas Cahraman, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Offices of Esperanza V. Bada, Esperanza V. Bada and Mark LaScola for Defendant and Appellant.
Jacobs & Gregory and David E. Gregory for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A rather shadowy (or perhaps even shady) entity called U A Funding (U A) leased two copiers. Danilo Bada signed the lease, both as the â€
