P. v. Desorbo
Filed 6/12/06 P. v. Desorbo CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GIOVANNI DESORBO, Defendant and Appellant. | B187925 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA087667) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Gerald M. Mansfield, Judge. Affirmed.
Julie Schumer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
___________________________
Giovanni Desorbo entered a negotiated guilty plea to possessing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377) on March 8, 2005. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on three years of formal probation, one condition of which was successful completion of a Proposition 36 drug treatment program. (Pen. Code, §§ 1210, 1210.1, subd. (a).) Probation was revoked and reinstated twice, each time following Desorbo's admission he had violated probation conditions. After the third revocation, the court found him unamenable to treatment (Pen. Code, § 1210.1, subd. (c)(2)), remanded him into custody, and ordered him evaluated for drug court. On October 27, 2005, Desorbo was accepted into drug court, released on his own recognizance, and ordered to complete an out-patient treatment program as a condition of probation. On November 3, 2005, the drug court terminated Desorbo for failing to appear and transferred the matter to the trial court for judgment and sentencing. At sentencing on November 28, 2005, the court found him in violation of probation, revoked and terminated probation, and sentenced Desorbo to the middle term of two years in state prison.
This appeal followed. We appointed counsel to represent Desorbo on appeal.
After examination of the record counsel filed an â€
