In re Ryan C.

Filed 6/12/06 In re Ryan C. CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Q. Clay, III, Judge. Affirmed in part and remanded with directions.

Bruce G. Finebaum, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Mary Sanchez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Stephanie A. Miyoshi, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

SUMMARY

Minor appellant challenges the decision of the juvenile court sustaining a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition against him on the ground that one of the probation conditions recorded in the court's minute order did not accurately reflect the condition imposed by the court. We agree and direct the trial court to correct its minute order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Police officers found appellant in possession of a stolen car, parts removed from the car, and a shaved wrench that was able to start the car.

The juvenile court sustained a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition alleging receiving stolen property and possession of burglar tools. It found not true a charge that appellant operated a chop shop. The court declared appellant a ward of the court, and ordered him placed in camp.

DISCUSSION

Among the conditions of probation imposed upon appellant by the juvenile court was that he â€