legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v.MONIZ Part II

PEOPLE v.MONIZ Part II
06:13:2006

PEOPLE v.MONIZ


Filed 6/6/06


CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*



COPY


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Yolo)


----








THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


STEPHEN MICHAEL MONIZ,


Defendant and Appellant.



C048738



(Super. Ct. No. CRF036599)





APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, Michael W. Sweet, J. Affirmed.


Valerie G. Wass, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Mathew Chan, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Story continue from Part I …….


The court instructed the jurors that in order to find defendant guilty of destroying or concealing evidence in count 7, they must find the prosecution had proved each of the following elements: â€





Description A decision reagarding Conviction for concealing or destroying evidence is not a misdemeanor related to use of drugs for purposes of Proposition 36 treatment, even if the concealed or destroyed evidence is drugs or drug-related.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale