Alvarado v. Hunley
Filed 2/24/06 Alvarado v. Hunley CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| EDITH A. ALVARADO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES HUNLEY, Defendant and Appellant. | B184666 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KS009892) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Richard D. Hughes, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Reversed with directions.
James Hunley, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.
Aleshire & Wynder, Fred Galante and Tiffany J. Israel for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________
Defendant and appellant James Hunley (Hunley), in propria persona, appeals a restraining order obtained by plaintiff and respondent Edith Alvarado (Alvarado), the building permit/business license clerk for the City of Irwindale.[1] The order directs Hunley to stay at least 10 yards away from Alvarado and to refrain from entering Irwindale City Hall unless he has a prior appointment with one Armando Hegdal, made at least one hour in advance via telephone.
We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in issuing a restraining order because Alvarado failed to establish that Hunley engaged in a â€
