Filed 5/26/06 In re Victor R. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
In re VICTOR R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VICTOR R., Defendant and Appellant. | F048250 (Super. Ct. No. JJD059274) OPINION |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. William Silveira, Jr., Judge.
John R. Hargreaves, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Kathleen A. McKenna and Connie A. Proctor, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Victor R. challenges the juvenile court's adjudication under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, contending (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the Penal Code section 186.22[1] finding; (2) counsel rendered ineffective assistance; and (3) the juvenile court erred in setting a maximum theoretical period of confinement. He also contends one probation condition is unconstitutionally overbroad and another constitutes an abuse of discretion. We will affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
When sheriff's department deputies were at a recruiting fair at Golden West High School, Victor approached their table several times. At one point, Victor stated he was a â€
