P. v. Robinson
Filed 5/30/06 P. v. Robinson CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TERRY ROBINSON, Defendant and Appellant. | B185963 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA057665) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Joan Comparet-Cassani, Judge. Affirmed.
Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_____________________
Defendant Terry Robinson appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court found him to be in violation of probation, imposed the previously suspended midterm sentence of four years for his crime of possession for sale of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5) and awarded him total presentence custody credit of 268 days.[1] We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. After examining the record, counsel filed a request for an independent review of the record for arguable issues pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
On March 15, 2006, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to submit personally any contentions or issues that he wanted us to consider. To date, we have received no response. We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendant's counsel has complied fully with his responsibilities. No arguable issues exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
SPENCER, P. J.
We concur:
VOGEL, J.
ROTHSCHILD, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Apartment Manager Attorneys.
[1] Appellate counsel has informed this court that the trial court subsequently granted his motion to amend the abstract of judgment to reflect a total presentence custody credit of 290 days.
