legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Birrey

P. v. Birrey
02:27:2006

Filed 12/15/05 P. v. Birrey CA6


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


THE PEOPLE, H026596


Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Clara County


Superior Court


v. No. CC254536)


ANTONIO MADINA BIRREY,


Defendant and Appellant.


_____________________________________/


Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of forcible lewd conduct on a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)(1)). The trial court imposed concurrent upper terms of eight years in state prison. Defendant asserts that the aggravating circumstances identified by the trial court were either not supported by any evidence or were elements of the offenses that could not be used to justify imposition of an upper term. We find that three of the five aggravating circumstances cited by the trial court were improper, and we reverse and remand for resentencing.


I. Background


Defendant, a 52-year-old man, lived in an apartment next door to the apartment in which the 11-year-old victim lived with her father and sister. The victim had known defendant for â€





Description A decision regarding forciable lewd conduct.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale