In re Lindsey L. and Daniel L.
Filed 5/15/06 In re Lindsey L. and Daniel L. CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re LINDSEY L. and DANIEL L., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B187570 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK59244) |
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CLAUDIA S., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. D. Zeke Zeidler, Judge. Affirmed.
Kate M. Chandler, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
M. Elizabeth Handy, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Appellant Minors.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Lisa Proft, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
INTRODUCTION
A mother and two children appeal the juvenile court's jurisdictional findings and dispositional order in a dependency proceeding. We find that substantial evidence supported the jurisdictional findings sustaining allegations pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a), (b), and (j).[1] We further find that substantial evidence supported the dispositional order removing custody of the children from their parents, and that any error arising from the failure to state the facts on which the decision to remove the children was based was harmless. We affirm the judgment.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORY
On May 31, 2005, the Department of Children and Family Services (â€