Father Flanagan's Boys Home v. Morrison & Foerster
Filed 5/24/06 Father Flanagan's Boys Home v. Morrison & Foerster CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOME, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MORRISON & FOERSTER et al., Defendants and Respondents. | G035251 (Super. Ct. No. 03CC11053) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard O. Frazee, Judge. Affirmed.
Kirtland & Packard, Robert K. Friedl, Robert A. Muhlbach and Scott M. Schultz, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Caldwell, Leslie, Newcombe & Pettit, Christopher G. Caldwell, Robyn C. Crowther and Michael D. Roth, for Defendant and Respondent Morrison & Foerster.
Father Flanagan's Boys Home (Flanagan) appeals from a judgment entered after the court sustained Morrison & Foerster's demurrer to its first amended complaint for legal malpractice. The court had previously decided to treat Morrison & Foerster's motion for summary judgment on the initial complaint as a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and granted that motion with leave to amend. After Flanagan filed its amended complaint, Morrison & Foerster demurred, successfully arguing the new factual allegations added in the first amended complaint did not â€
