P. v. Stuart
Filed 5/24/06 P. v. Stuart CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ZANE FRANCIS STUART, Defendant and Appellant. | G034983 (Super. Ct. No. 04HF1016) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Susanne S. Shaw, Judge. Affirmed.
Thien Huong Tran, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Rhonda Cartwright-Ladendorf and Annie Featherman Fraser, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Zane Stuart was convicted of two counts of residential burglary. He contends the convictions should be overturned because the trial court admitted evidence of a prior prowling incident. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
* * *
On May 5, 2004, Stuart was seen urinating near the dumpsters of the Pine Creek apartment complex in Costa Mesa. When apartment manager Timothy Slemp confronted him, Stuart said he lived in the complex, but did not know where. He was wearing baggie jeans, and when he bent over, Slemp noticed he had on women's thong underwear. Upon leaving the property, he gave Slemp â€
