legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Larry S. v. Superior Court

Larry S. v. Superior Court
06:13:2006

Larry S


Larry S. v. Superior Court


 


 


Filed 5/19/06  Larry S. v. Superior Court CA4/2


 


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


 


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


 


FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


 


DIVISION TWO







LARRY S.,


            Petitioner,


v.


THE SUPERIOR COURT OF


SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,


            Respondent;


SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES,


            Real Party in Interest.



            E039989


            (Super. Ct. No. RIJ108097)


            OPINION



            ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ.  Becky Dugan, Judge.  Petition denied.


            David A. Goldstein for Petitioner.


            No appearance for Respondent.


            Joe S. Rank, County Counsel, and Julie Koons Jarvi, Deputy County Counsel for Real Party in Interest.


            No appearance for Minor.


            In a petition for extraordinary writ relief under California Rules of Court, rule 38.1, subdivision (a), Larry S. (father) challenges the juvenile court's order terminating reunification services and setting the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] hearing.  Father argues that both he and mother substantially complied with the reunification plan, and that the juvenile court improperly considered the de facto parent's bond with the minor in reaching its decision to terminate services.  We reject petitioner's arguments and conclude that substantial evidence supports the juvenile court's findings.  Accordingly, we deny the petition.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


            Minor Issac S. (minor) was taken into protective custody shortly after his birth in June 2004, when both he and mother tested positive for methamphetamines.  In addition, mother did not have stable housing and she had been a victim of domestic violence perpetrated by father.  Mother previously had two other children removed from her care and her parental rights were later terminated.  She admitted to the social worker from the Department of Public Social Services (department) that â€





Description A decision regarding terminating reunification services and setting the Welfare and Institutions Code.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale