legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Williamson

P. v. Williamson
06:14:2006

P


P. v. Williamson


 


 


Filed 5/16/06  P. v. Williamson CA4/2


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


 


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


 


FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


 


DIVISION TWO







THE PEOPLE,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


GERARD WELCOME WILLIAMSON,


            Defendant and Appellant.



            E038999


            (Super.Ct.No. SWF007484)


            OPINION



            APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County.  James T. Warren, Judge.  Affirmed.


            Cynthia M. Sorman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


            Gerard Williamson pled guilty to check forgery.  (Pen. Code, § 470, subd. (d).)  As part of his plea bargain, he waived his right to appeal.  He was sentenced to the agreed-to term of eight months in prison, to run consecutively to the term he was then serving.  His request for a certificate of probable cause was denied by the trial court.


            Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him.  Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.


            We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.


            We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.


            The judgment is affirmed.


            NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


                                                                                                /s/ RAMIREZ                             


P.J.


We concur:


/s/ McKINSTER                      


                                                     J.


/s/ KING                             


                                                     J.


Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.


Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Apartment Manager Attorneys.







Description A decision regarding check forgery.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale