legal news


Register | Forgot Password

VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY,

VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY,
06:14:2006

VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC v


VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY,


 


Filed 5/26/06


 


 


 


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


 


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION THREE







VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC.,


                      Petitioner,


v.


THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY,


                      Respondent;


BUDDY RUSK, SR.,


                      Real Party in Interest.


          A112934


          (City & County of San Francisco


          Super. Ct. No. CGC-03-427160)


                      Are documents submitted to bankruptcy trusts by a plaintiff' s attorney in support of claims for compensation for alleged asbestos-related injuries discoverable in similar litigation against another entity?  We conclude that most such documents normally are, and shall issue a writ of mandate to correct an overly restrictive discovery order entered in the trial court.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


                      On December 10, 2003, real party in interest Buddy Rusk, Sr., filed suit against 67 named defendants, including petitioner Volkswagen of America, Inc. (Volkswagen), for injuries he allegedly suffered as a result of asbestos exposure.  In April 2005 Volkswagen requested the production of â€





Description Aa decision regarding injuries allegedly suffered as a result of asbestos exposure submitted in a bankruptcy proceedings.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale