In re S.L.
Filed 5/17/06 In re S.L. CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re S. L. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CONNIE B., Defendant and Appellant. | A110495 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. JD033373) |
Connie B. (hereafter Mother) appeals from the order continuing the dependency of her daughters S. L., A. L., and N. L. Mother challenges two findings made by the juvenile court, contending that there is no substantial evidence to support the findings that: (1) respondent San Francisco Human Services Agency (Agency) provided reasonable reunification services to her, and (2) returning custody of the children to her would be detrimental to the children. We conclude that neither challenge is well taken, and therefore affirm the order of the juvenile court.
BACKGROUND
In August of 2003, the Agency filed a petition to have the children declared dependents under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g). The relevant allegations of petition were that Mother had a substance abuse problem that led her to leave the children with their elderly grandfather, who was unable to care for them, and that Mother â€
