legal news


Register | Forgot Password

CAMACHO v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB (Part II )

CAMACHO v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB (Part II )
06:14:2006

CAMACHO v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB



Filed 5/3/06






CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*







IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT






DIVISION EIGHT











JOAQUIN CAMACHO,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA et al.,


Defendants and Appellants;


BELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA,


Defendant and Respondent.



B180134


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BC 315357)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Victoria Gerrard Chaney, Judge. Affirmed.


Angelo & Di Monda, Christopher E. Angelo, Joseph Di Monda; Spray Gould & Bowers, Keith Walden, Darren M. Harris, and Stan A. Grombchevsky for Plaintiff and Appellant.


Reed Smith, Lorenzo Gasparetti, Kathy M. Banke, and Margaret M. Grignon for Defendants and Appellants.


Carlson, Messer & Turner, Charles R. Messer, Steven Jung, and Larissa G. Nefulda for Defendant and Respondent.


Story continued from Part I……….


Second, anticompetitive conduct is best defined in terms of the policy and spirit of antitrust laws; the same cannot be said of a business practice that is â€





Description A decision wherein declared that anticompetitive conduct is best defined in terms of the policy and spirit of antitrust laws; the same cannot be said of a business practice that is 'unfair' or 'deceptive' in the terms of section 17200.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale