legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. JAMES

P. v. JAMES
06:14:2006

P. v. JAMES


Filed 4/27/06


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA






FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT




DIVISION THREE










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


JAMES JAY PILSTER,


Defendant and Appellant.



G035130


(Super. Ct. No. 03HF1025)


O P I N I O N



Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Susanne S. Shaw, Judge. Affirmed.


Richard L. Schwartzberg for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa Torreblanca and Sharon L. Rhodes, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


* * *


A jury convicted Jay Pilster of assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1).) At trial, the prosecutor used defendant's prearrest statements to an investigating officer to impeach his testimonial account of the alleged crime. Because the interviewing officer failed to provide him with Miranda warnings even though he was handcuffed during the interview, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his request to instruct the jury that they could consider his prearrest statements only on the issue of his credibility, per CALJIC No. 2.13.1. We agree the instruction should have been given, but conclude the error was harmless. Consequently, we affirm the judgment.


I


Facts


Stephen Hurley entered the patio area of a Laguna Beach brewery around 1:00 a.m. on the morning of June 22, 2003. As Hurley moved through the patio, defendant bumped into him, spinning him around. Defendant took a step toward Hurley and said â€





Description A decision regarding assault with a deadly weapon.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale