P v. CHATMAN

Filed 5/8/06

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff and Respondent, )

) S032509

v. )

)

ERIK SANFORD CHATMAN, )

) Santa Clara County

Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. 143749

___________ )

Story Continued from Part I …….

By stipulation, the motion was assigned to a different judge from the one who had heard the first disqualification motion. The second motion was denied. The judge concluded an evidentiary hearing was unnecessary: â€