P.v. Williams
Filed 7/28/09 P.v. Williams CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DOMANICK DEMON WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. | B211441 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA038272) |
THE COURT:*
Domanick Demon Williams appeals from the judgment entered following his plea of guilty to attempted home invasion robbery of Medasia Matthews (Pen. Code, 664, 211)[1]and attempted home invasion robbery of Jaivonia Thomas ( 664, 211). Appellant admitted that as to both counts he personally used and discharged a firearm, inflicting great bodily injury, within the meaning of section 12022.53, subdivision (b). Appellant admitted the prior conviction alleged as MA024721, on July 25, 2002,
pursuant to section 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d) and section 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) (the Three Strikes law). He also admitted the prior conviction alleged as MA024721, on July 25, 2002, pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b) and pursuant to section 667, subdivision (a)(1).
On April 12, 2007, in the early morning hours, appellant and three other gunmen entered the residence of Jayvon Thomas (Thomas) and held a gun to Thomass wife Kizzy and their daughters, Medasia Matthews and Jaivonia Thomas. Medasia called out to her father, who had been awakened by loud noises. Thomas entered the room with a loaded handgun and, when he saw that his family was being held by four gunmen, began shooting. Thomas was shot in the leg and the arm, and Medasia was shot in the elbow. They were transported to a hospital by paramedics. Appellant was at the same hospital being treated for a gunshot wound in the leg, and was subsequently arrested.
Appellant was sentenced to 25 years in state prison as to count 1 as follows: the upper term of nine years (four years and six months doubled pursuant to the Three Strikes law); 10 years pursuant to section 12022.53; five years pursuant to section 667, subdivision (a)(1); and one year pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b). He was sentenced to a concurrent term of 25 years in state prison as to count 2 as follows: the upper term of nine years (four years and six months doubled pursuant to the Three Strikes law); 10 years pursuant to section 12022.53; five years pursuant to section 667, subdivision (a)(1); and one year pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b).
We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal.
After examination of the record, counsel filed an Opening Brief in which no issues were raised.
On April 29, 2009, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com
* BOREN, P. J., DOI TODD, J., ASHMANN-GERST, J.
[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
