legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Taylor

P. v. Taylor
06:14:2006

P. v. Taylor







Filed 4/28/06 P. v. Taylor CA2/4






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT






DIVISION FOUR














THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


FREDERICK JEROME TAYLOR,


Defendant and Appellant.



B175932


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. SA037136)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,


Keith L. Schwartz, Judge. Affirmed.


David M. Thompson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels and Yun K. Lee, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Appellant Frederick Jerome Taylor appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of second degree robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211.[1] The jury further found that the value of the property taken exceeded $150,000 (§ 12022.6, subd. (a)(2)) and that a principal was armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). The judge made a finding that appellant had two prior â€





Description A criminal law decision regarding second degree robbery.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale