LYNN v. ROBERT
Filed 4/27/06
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| In re Marriage of ROBERT A. and LYNN A. WALKER. |
|
|
LYNN A. WALKER, Appellant, v. ROBERT A. WALKER, Respondent. |
A109284
(Lake County Super. Ct. No. FL046138)
|
Continued from Part I……….
The court's task in construing a statute is, of course, to ascertain the Legislature's intent to effectuate the purpose of the statute. (Renee J. v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 735, 743.) To that end, the various parts of a statutory enactment must be harmonized by considering the particular clause in the context of the statutory framework as a whole. (Ibid.) Because Family Code section 1100, subdivision (e) specifically incorporates the scope of spousal fiduciary duty set forth in the simultaneously enacted Family Code section 721, and section 721 required a spouse to render true and full information â€
