P. v. Ransom
Filed 6/14/06 P. v. Ransom CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALICIA RANSOM, Defendant and Appellant. | C050643
(Super. Ct. No. 05F03373)
|
After the trial court denied her suppression motion, defendant Alicia Ransom entered a negotiated plea of no contest to one count of possession of cocaine base. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).) The trial court placed defendant on probation for three years, imposed and suspended a 90-day jail term, and referred defendant to a drug treatment program under Proposition 36.
On appeal, defendant challenges the validity of the vehicle stop that led to her arrest, asserting the court erred in denying her motion to suppress. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Standard of Review
â€
