legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Walker v. Pierce

Walker v. Pierce
06:16:2006

Walker v. Pierce



Filed 6/14/06 Walker v. Pierce CA2/4




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FOUR










DIANE WALKER,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


ANNIE PIERCE,


Defendant and Appellant.



B184693


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BC314386)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gregory W. Alarcon, Judge. Affirmed.


Annie P. Pierce, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.


______________________________


Annie Pierce appeals from a judgment against her following court trial in this action for fraud and violation of Civil Code section 1695.[1] We find no basis for reversal and affirm.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY


This is an appeal on the judgment roll because Pierce did not provide a reporter's transcript of the court trial. â€





Description A decision regarding fraud and rescission based on violation of the California Home Equity Sales Contracts Act.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale