Preciado v. County of Los Angeles
Filed 6/14/06 Preciado v. County of Los Angeles CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| CHRISTIAN PRECIADO, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. | B184667 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC310120) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ernest M. Hiroshige, Judge. Affirmed.
Forgey & Hurrell, Hurrell & Cantrall, Thomas C. Hurrell and Melinda Cantrall for Defendants and Appellants.
Law Offices of Luis A. Carrillo and Luis A. Carrillo for Plaintiff and Respondent.
____________________________________
Defendants County of Los Angeles (County), Cesar Romero, Daniel Vargas, and Cruz Casas (collectively appellants) appeal from the order granting a new trial in favor of Christian Preciado, the plaintiff by and through his guardian ad litem, Esther Ceja. Appellants contend the trial court erred because certain juror statements â€
