P. v. Setodeh
Filed 6/14/06 P. v. Setodeh CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PORANG GODARZI SETODEH, Defendant and Appellant. | B184189 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SA036653) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elden S. Fox, Judge. Affirmed.
Ellen M. Matsumoto, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________________________
Porang Setodeh appeals from the judgment entered following a jury in which he was convicted of attempted voluntary manslaughter, a lesser offense of the charged crime of attempted murder. Defendant was further found to have used a deadly weapon and inflicted great bodily injury in the commission of the offense. He was sentenced to the low term of 16 months, plus 4 years for enhancements, and filed a timely notice of appeal. We appointed counsel to represent him.
On December 16, 2005, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441–442.) We then sent notice to defendant that within 30 days he could personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to consider. Counsel thereafter requested extensions on defendant's behalf, explaining that defendant is housed in a facility that is under a lockdown order and he has had limited access to the law library. On March 6, 2005, we granted a third extension request, requiring any supplemental brief to be filed by April 16, 2006. To date, no brief has been received.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that counsel has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
MALLANO, Acting P. J.
We concur:
VOGEL, J.
ROTHSCHILD, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.
Analysis and review provided by Vista Apartment Manager Lawyers.
