P. v. Sherrod
Filed 6/16/06 P. v. Sherrod CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHAN EDWARD SHERROD, Defendant and Appellant. |
F047873
(Super. Ct. No. F02907554-0)
OPINION |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Brant K. Bramer, Temporary Judge.*
Ann Hopkins, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Charles A. French and Brook Bennigson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
In August of 2003, after initially pleading not guilty, Nathan Edward Sherrod (appellant) pled guilty as charged to one count of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211)[1] along with a personal firearm use allegation (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)), and one count of grand theft (§ 487, subd. (a)). He admitted he had suffered a prior strike (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)), a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)), and had served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). At sentencing, the trial court struck appellant's prior strike, imposed but stayed a 21-year 8-month sentence, placed appellant on probation, and ordered him to complete â€
