Worth v. Viacell, Inc.
Filed 6/19/06 Worth v. Viacell, Inc. CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| KENNETH D. WORTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. VIACELL, INC., Defendant and Respondent. | G034805 (Super. Ct. No. 04CC05566) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, C. Robert Jameson, Judge. Dismissed.
The Worth Law Firm and Kenneth D. Worth for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Davis & Rayburn and Thomas P. Davis for Defendant and Respondent.
* * *
Appellant Kenneth D. Worth, represented by his own law firm, filed this appeal from a dismissal following an order granting two special motions to strike his complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. The complaint asserts a representative action under Business and Professions Code section 17200.
Defendant filed a supplemental brief arguing that plaintiff lacked standing under Proposition 64 because he cannot assert that he â€
