STARK v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY
Filed 6/15/06
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sutter)
----
| ROBERT E. STARK, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. |
C051073, C051074
(Super. Ct. Nos. CRMS051001, CRMS051031)
|
| RONDA G. PUTNAM, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. |
C051075
(Super. Ct. No. CRMS051030)
|
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS in mandate. Ted H. Hansen, Judge. Peremptory writ issued.
Rothschild, Wishek, Chastaine & Sands, M. Bradley Wishek; Marilyn Fisher, for Petitioner Robert E. Stark.
Blackmon & Associates, Clyde M. Blackmon, Melinda J. Nye; Marilyn Fisher, for Petitioner Ronda Putman.
Story continue from Part V ………….
Because we have rejected all of Stark's challenges to this count, it follows that the trial court did not err in denying Stark's motion to set aside the ninth count of the indictment.
H
Tenth Count
Attempt To Withhold IT Wages
The tenth count of the indictment alleges that Stark violated section 646 and section 424(a)(7) by â€
