STARK v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY
Filed 6/15/06
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sutter)
----
| ROBERT E. STARK, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. |
C051073, C051074
(Super. Ct. Nos. CRMS051001, CRMS051031)
|
| RONDA G. PUTNAM, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. |
C051075
(Super. Ct. No. CRMS051030)
|
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS in mandate. Ted H. Hansen, Judge. Peremptory writ issued.
Rothschild, Wishek, Chastaine & Sands, M. Bradley Wishek; Marilyn Fisher, for Petitioner Robert E. Stark.
Blackmon & Associates, Clyde M. Blackmon, Melinda J. Nye; Marilyn Fisher, for Petitioner Ronda Putman.
Story continue from Part III ………….
In People v. Eubanks, supra, 14 Cal.4th at page 580, the Supreme Court revisited the standards for prosecutorial recusal under section 1424. In doing so, the court explained as follows: â€
