P. v. Magee

Filed 6/13/06 P. v. Magee CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, H029246

(Santa Clara County

v. Super.Ct.No. CC472959)

JAMAL MARQUISE MAGEE,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________/

Jamal Magee appeals after pleading guilty to one count of sale of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)) and admitted a prior juvenile adjudication pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 for an offense listed in Welfare and Institutions Code section 707, subdivision (b) within the meaning of Penal Code sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12 Appellant was sentenced to state prison for a total of six years with other conditions. We appointed counsel to represent appellant. Counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts, but raises no specific issues. We have notified appellant of his right to submit written argument and he has done so.

Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

ELIA, J.

WE CONCUR:

__________________________________

RUSHING, P. J.

__________________________________

PREMO, J.

Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Santee Apartment Manager Attorneys.