PEOPLE v. SOLOMON
Filed 7/15/10
IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE
PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and
Respondent, )
) S029011
v. )
)
MORRIS
SOLOMON, JR., )
) Sacramento
County
Defendant and Appellant. ) Super.
Ct. No. 84641
__________________________________ )
Story continued from part III…..
ii.
Prospective Juror S.C.
Prospective Juror S.C.
indicated in her questionnaire and during questioning that she supported the
death penalty. She also stated she
believed there are individuals who should be sentenced to death. However, in response to the question whether
there was any reason she would like, or not like, to sit as a juror in the
case, she wrote, â€
| Description | This is an appeal from an order denying the defendants' motion to compel arbitration. Applying the law to the undisputed facts and exercising our independent judgment, we reverse the trial court's ruling. As we explain below, the plaintiff cannot avoid arbitrating its claims against the signatory defendant, because those claims are within the reach of the arbitration clause. And the plaintiff cannot avoid arbitrating its claims against the nonsignatory defendant, because those claims are inextricably bound up with the obligations arising out of the agreement containing the arbitration clause. |
| Rating |
