legal news


Register | Forgot Password

MOLECULAR ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS v. CIPHERGEN BIOSYSTEMS, INC Part-I

MOLECULAR ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS v. CIPHERGEN BIOSYSTEMS, INC Part-I
08:25:2010



MOLECULAR ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS v




MOLECULAR ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS v.
CIPHERGEN BIOSYSTEMS, INC




















Filed 7/9/10











CERTIFIED
FOR PUBLICATION



IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH
APPELLATE DISTRICT




>






MOLECULAR ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS,



Plaintiff and
Respondent,



v.



CIPHERGEN BIOSYSTEMS, INC. et
al.,



Defendants and
Appellants.




H032845

(Santa Clara
County

Super. Ct.
No. CV89501)






This is an
appeal from an order denying the defendants' motion to compel arbitration. Applying the law to the undisputed facts and
exercising our independent judgment, we reverse the trial court's ruling. As we explain below, the plaintiff cannot
avoid arbitrating its claims against the signatory defendant, because those
claims are within the reach of the arbitration
clause. And the plaintiff cannot
avoid arbitrating its claims against the nonsignatory defendant, because those
claims are inextricably bound up with the obligations arising out of the
agreement containing the arbitration clause.

BACKGROUND



The parties
to this action are Molecular Analytic Systems (plaintiff or MAS) and Ciphergen
Biosystems, Inc. and Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (defendants).

The Contracts



Plaintiff
is in a contractual relationship with defendant Ciphergen, arising from various
contracts, including two that are at issue here: a License Agreement and a Settlement
Agreement, both executed in 2003 following settlement of prior litigation.
Plaintiff has no express contractual relationship with defendant Bio-Rad.

Both of the
agreements at issue here contain arbitration
provisions. Section 13.1 of the
Settlement Agreement requires arbitration of â€




Description This is an appeal from an order denying the defendants' motion to compel arbitration. Applying the law to the undisputed facts and exercising our independent judgment, we reverse the trial court's ruling. As we explain below, the plaintiff cannot avoid arbitrating its claims against the signatory defendant, because those claims are within the reach of the arbitration clause. And the plaintiff cannot avoid arbitrating its claims against the nonsignatory defendant, because those claims are inextricably bound up with the obligations arising out of the agreement containing the arbitration clause.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale