PEOPLE v. LOMAX
Filed 7/1/10
IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff
and Respondent, )
) S057321
v. )
)
DARREL LEE LOMAX, )
)
Los
Angeles County
Defendant
and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.
No. NA023819
__________________________________ )
Story continued from part II…..
B. Stun
Belt
Defendant
argues the court violated his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendments, and his corresponding state constitutional rights, by
ordering him to wear an electronic security belt during trial. We conclude this order was an appropriate
exercise of the court's discretion.
In
general, the â€
| Description | A jury convicted defendant of two robberies, with a murder in the course of the second. It found he had used a firearm in all the offenses and found true a robbery-murder special circumstance. Because the jury set the penalty at death, this appeal is automatic. Court affirm. |
| Rating |
