Ramirez v. Kar
Filed 2/24/06 Ramirez v. Kar CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
GLICERIO D. RAMIREZ,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
MANOJ KAR et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
|
E038280
(Super.Ct.No. VCV 034515)
OPINION
|
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Jules E. Fleuret, Judge. Affirmed.
Glicerio D. Ramirez, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Bruce A. Behrens, Chief Counsel, Linda Cohen Harrel, Deputy Chief Counsel, Carol Quan, Assistant Chief Counsel, and Patrick H. Barney, Deputy Attorney for Defendants and Respondents.
1. Introduction
Plaintiff Glicerio D. Ramirez appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend defendants' demurrer to Ramirez's complaint for employment discrimination based on hostile work environment, for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and for punitive damages and lost wages.
Our review is hampered because Ramirez, acting in propria persona, has not followed the rules and conventions of appellate procedure: â€
