P. v. Yoo
Filed 6/20/06 P. v. Yoo CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAE KOO YOO, Defendant and Appellant. |
C049315
(Super. Ct. No. 04F02762)
|
Defendant Jae Koo Yoo pled guilty to two counts of attempted murder and admitted that he personally used a deadly weapon and inflicted great bodily injury in committing each crime. He was sentenced to state prison for 16 years, eight months; was awarded 219 days of presentence custody credit and 32 days of conduct credit; was ordered to make restitution to the victims; and was directed to pay a $3,200 restitution fine, another $3,200 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked, a $20 court security fee, booking fee, and classification fees.
Defendant appeals, and we appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks us to review the record and to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
SCOTLAND , P.J.
We concur:
DAVIS , J.
NICHOLSON , J.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Apartment Manager Lawyers.
