ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Filed 8/3/10
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
ONE
ABRAHAM
KHAN,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
LOS
ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Defendant and Appellant.
B214685
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BS108965)
STORY CONTINUE FROM
PART I….
B. There is No Reciprocity Between LACERS and JRS/JRS II.
| Description | The Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System (LACERS) appeals from a judgment in favor of Abraham Khan (Khan) granting his petition for writ of mandate compelling LACERS to approve his request for concurrent deferred retirement benefits with LACERS and the Judicial Retirement System (JRS).[1] The sole issue on appeal is whether LACERS and JRS have reciprocity provisions such that Khan, a Judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County who had worked for the City of Los Angeles (City) as a City Attorney, may retire from LACERS at his higher judicial salary. We conclude they do not, and reverse and remand with directions that the trial court enter judgment in favor of LACERS. |
| Rating |
