In re Ramon E.
sFiled 6/21/06 In re Ramon E. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| In re RAMON E., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. |
|
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAMON E., Defendant and Appellant. |
F049351
(Super. Ct. No. 05CEJ601204-1)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Kimberly Nystrom-Geist, Commissioner.
Thomas Owen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Stan Cross and Michael Dolida, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
INTRODUCTION AND PERTINENT FACTS
After suffering a juvenile adjudication for sexual battery in violation of Penal Code section 243.2, subdivision (e)(1), appellant Ramon E. was placed on probation for one year. The maximum period of confinement was set at one year.[1]
DISCUSSION
I. A probation condition is vague and requires modification.
One of the conditions of appellant's probation is that he is â€
